Home Dead by Daylight Forums Discussions General Discussions

The comparison argument

I'm going to say this now its a stupid argument.

The reason why I hate the comparison argument is, because your trying to compare two separate roles and acting like it's one.

It like i comparing zamshin tactics and windows of opportunities they are the exact same perk, but one is descent and the other is bad. Its cause of what role you play that the information it gives is vital or is irrelevant.

When people try to compare 2 perks they try to twist it so they could be similar to each other, but these roles are different from each other.

I think why people try to compare perks is because they want to make it sound convincing for somone.

Comments

  • Leachy_JrLeachy_Jr Member Posts: 1,845

    I'm guessing you're talking about pop and DS scene as though those are the only perks people are comparing currently.

    We don't compare their ability, gen regression and escaping the grasp are 2 different things.

    What we are comparing them as is meta perks, why would you nerf a balanced meta perk (pop) when DS is still busted and 10x more unbalanced. Other perks like unbreakable and SG just add to this.

Sign In or Register to comment.