Home Dead by Daylight Forums Discussions General Discussions

Community should have the powers to vote against a killer to be released...

edited June 2019 in General Discussions

...and revert/roll-back/remove/cancel the PTB

I dont neet to talk much, just check all these threads complaining...

we have NO power but a t-bagging killer


  • vampire_toothyvampire_toothy Member Posts: 381

    Well, I don't think it's fair to say that they aren't doing their best. Afterall their job is to make the game, not master every aspect of it. If we look at Spirit for instance, she started off as an average killer but with some changes the developers made thanks to feedback she turned into an amazing killer.

    Plus that doesn't address the second point, which is that if the developers took this idea into account then survivors would be able to deny strong killers from being released.


    Some kids will just buy GF cuz his T-bagging ha-bully-ty thought

  • RoKruegerRoKrueger Member Posts: 1,371

    Just vote with your wallet and be done with it

  • AshleyWBAshleyWB Member Posts: 4,062

    Voting to say you're not happy is understandable but without a valid reason (which a lot of voters won't have) then you'll just have to put up and shut up. Not everything is to everyone's taste. If it needs changing voting against it releasing won't help them out.

  • fcc2014fcc2014 Member Posts: 4,388

    @BACKSTABBER the only solution is not buy it. If it doesn't sell well they will have to change it or they wasted the last 3 months.

  • TragicSolitudeTragicSolitude Member Posts: 6,026
    edited June 2019

    Money was already spent to pay the people working on this killer. Some randoms on a forum completely stopping the release of a killer that people worked months to create? This isn't a democracy. BHVR is a business, and consumers vote with their money. If you don't like the new killer, don't buy him.

    The problem is that BHVR needs people who recognize whether or not the team should spend months creating a killer who works a certain way, that way they don't waste resources and lose money. I don't expect everyone at BHVR to be experts at playing their game, but they could save time and money if they employed a few people who are actual players. Still, we're talking employees or consultants who can work with the team, not some randoms on the internet complaining or voting in a poll.

    Post edited by TragicSolitude on
  • Jacoby2041Jacoby2041 Member Posts: 843

    Instead of saying "oh my god this killer sucks just don't do a chapter better luck next time" we should say what we think is wrong and how we'd like to fix it,

    Which is what a lot of people are doing and I'm sure the devs understand the situation now. It is just a PTB which is meant for us to test and give feedback, which is what people are doing. Saying we should cancel it entirely is not helping, and you aren't really adding anything meaningful to the overall community wide conversation about the new killer.

  • BossBoss Member, Trusted Posts: 13,582

    They should be able to make whatever additions they want as long as it's legal.

    I know right now i'm just not buying him.

  • SythalinSythalin Member Posts: 280
    edited June 2019

    Given that the majority of the playerbase are survivors, this would be a terrible idea. They would just keep voting out any killer that is more than a M1 spammer, over 50 move speed, and isn't automatically stunned when entering a pallet's area before the pallet is even dropped (and subsequently stunned again when it is).

    This is easily proven by the amount of crying about the only 3 good killers in the game, and the review bombing anytime something happens that makes it so they can't bully killers.

Sign In or Register to comment.