Not that I care either way but why would they get in trouble?
Uh, using children in some things can get someone in trouble, this is a snow flake world now, a children killer in dbd, really? You cant pee ina pot without someone frowning on it, someone can find it very offensive and take it futher.
this sadly true
young killers? sure
young survivors? no
1Also all of Rin and legion. I think with Steve and Nancy they write it off because some of their outfits reflect them post high school. I don't think "18" really means anything its more like they wouldn't go past teenagers. But for the record I think they could do killer children, specifically if a licenses came up, survivors are probably off the table though lol
Only if it's a supernatural child with supernatural powers.
Legion already gets mocked and called 'not scary' and they're high school teenagers.
If we get a small child and they're not along the lines of Alma or Damien, then people will just die laughing at the 7 year old chasing David King with a knife.
the funny thing is the youngest killer in dbd is a tie between susey(legion) and lisa(hag) who are both 17
Though they could always just use the adult versions of both Alma and Damien to instantly dodge any issues that might come up with having children involved with violence.
I think the majority of potential younger-than-general-adult-age killers could probably be aged in a similar way (if they didn't already have adult versions from their origin series).
Yea, definitely; I'm just saying if we get a child it'd have to be supernatural like that.
Oh really because the last time videos got "in trouble" it was Trump blaming them for mass shootings (Fun fact DBD was one of the games he targeted as proof. Way before deathslinger) and despite Trump having a cult like following the outrage only lasted about a month. If Trump can not keep outrage going at something I think its safe to say we won the war.
So ignoring the "Im 14 and I am edgy and no one understands!" aspect of your reasoning, the reality of conservatives targeting video games is dead, Similar to something else conservatives constantly attacked until about the 90s, horror movies. A few decades ago it was the most evil thing since rock and roll and now no one cares. Thanks to facebook the type of people who get "offended" at stuff like that are now focusing all that energy on conspiracy theories and have been since Obama took office. If you actually watched Horror movies you'd know that even killing kids isnt taboo anymore (Looking at Myers) and there are plenty of shows, movies, and even other video games with killer children.
In conclusion Freddy is a pedophile and one of his add ons is a box of photographic he took, you could guess of what. Maybe that slipped under the radar because no one remembers that movie but I think its more likely that at this point you don't even have to be in good taste unless you are really really crossing that line no one cares
I think if done right it wouldn't be a big deal but I do think they'd have to be, minimum, teens. I agree with you about kids. So wait if bhvr says everyone has to be 18. Quinton was 17 in the movie, so I guess he could have dinged up to 18.
Well damn. I was hoping for maybe a classic Freddy and Nancy at some point but I guess that's out. Well unless she was from 3 instead of 1...
FYI Carrie is 16.
Wait wait wait...
hag is 17?
Yeah I dont see why not
You can take any anime character. They are all legal 100% 18 yo children.
yeah it was said in one of the old dev streams, everyone just assumed she was old because of her name and appearance but she is just a heavily mutilated young girl, if you look at her tome entry stroke of luck and the cutscene she is still in high school and it happened just before the events in her bio where she was caught by the swamp cannibals.
Don't see much chance of that ever happening. Could cause major conflict with the various game rating agencies.
Sachiko Shinozaki when? Corpse Party is a Nintendo IP. Go go.
Freddy was NOT a paedophile, the original film he was a child murderer, they changed him from a child molester to a child killer, and no where in the movie was it brought up he was a child molester. The reason being was because producers wanted to avoid comparisons to a story in California about a series of child molestations at the time of filming. Now the new one, fair enough but not sure what the rant was about, if BHVR put children in their game I just very much could see people not been happy, remember this is the snowflake generation and more to the question of WHY would you want to see children in this game? o.O
Yeah there is a big difference between children and teens though, I mean there is enough hormones about as it is (lol) but as I said to another why would any wish to see a child been a killer in the game I just personally feel it needs to stay out.
I was saying that yes it true people get offended easier now a day but it not going to stop thing it may still happen thing is killer kids got the same problem as chucky they short now fix that,I mean with chucky they say he could use his voodoo powers but other then a voodoo doll use in the first movie and his ability teleport his soul into other bodies don't help with hooks.
I still say survivors are the children of the corn.
how Corpse Party a Nintendo IP? it on steam and sony consoles....
Why did you write this. Most of this post is dedicated to telling the history of a Freddy I obviously wasn't talking about because i mention a specific plot point in the remake. My whole point of bringing him up was just to talk about his black box add on. Makes it seems like you haven't seen either of the movies which just further confuses me on why you would bother trying to write a lecture on a character you know nothing about outside of a piece of trivia lol.
Also talking about the whole "snowflake generation" really did a number on me talking about how nowadays there are really thin boundaries, there are killer children in many properties and even further movies about children killers (since you're not a horror fan I'll just tell you in the Halloween remake Myers kills kid and not even the most pearl clutching of karens gave a [BAD WORD]) something that would have crossed the line in any other generation. You your self actually points out how Freddy was basically censored because people would have been offended and the Freddy isnt. It also highlights how edgy doesn't always = better, being edgy for the sake of being edgy is normally a sure way of being what many would call cringe, as in the case of New Freddy. Don't know why im bringing that up, weird
Show me movies or video games that have been censored this decade out of requirement or because they were afraid of offending audiences. I doubt you could find any in america but even if you could why don't you go ahead and compare it to any other generation.
As long as they aren't survivors I'm fine
Children of the corn, Firestarter, Samara, Carrie, the kid from Sinister, and Chucky would make great additions to the game.
Seems @JimPickens666 just wishes to imply stuff, make him or herself a legend and doesn't know me, do not presumre you do and no one cares for most of the nonsesne you said :) i am 32 my horror generation trumps a lot
How about brightburn?
I dropped the whole offended thing I didn't even bring it up I was agree with @Mushwin this generation has got a lot more snow flakey but you know why I could care less what offended people now a day because everything offended people.
your horror fan so I'm am but bring up Halloween remake that was crappiest remake I every seen rob zombie really messed that up but I also never liked any of his horror movies with tho 3 characters in it.
no remake have been as good as the original.
That's a can of worms that doesn't need opened. A bunch of kids in a game with Freddy, the man who wasn't just killing them even in the original script? Yeah, there's bad taste, and then there's that.