Beating the dead horse: toxicity
I'm getting a bit confused about endless complaints about toxicity. The way some players cry out, you'd think 90% of the DBD playerbase is made of carefully selected Jerry Springer guests.
My experience is very different. So... I went ahead and started to keep track of my games. Not recording, just keeping notes on how "toxic" players were, and how the endgame chat looked like. So far, 62 games, most of them with Freddy, rank 1 and 2.
About a third of these were against 3 or 4 SWF.
4 games out of the 62 were ones with people apparently crashing at start, so I mostly farmed, these don't really count.
- Not a word: 8 games
- Friendly chat or at least a "gg": 44 games
- Whining (e.g. "tunneler", "camper"): 4 games
- "Toxic" (insults, obscenities and the like): 2 games
- Trolling, e.g. flashlight or sound spamming, excessive teabagging (btw I don't think any of these is really harmful in any way, but I know a lot of people hate it): only 7 games.
I even had games where I slugged everyone with Freddy and let them bleed out, and one where I did a by-the-book facecamping with Leatherface, and still only got a civilized notion: "you could troll less you know".
You whiners out there who constantly cry about DBD playerbase being "cancerous" and "toxic". You're wrong. Even with the occasional mild trolls and the very rare ones who are genuinely obnoxious, DBD playerbase is largely a bunch of nice and polite people. So all you pathetic, whining virgin bitches can ######### off and take your endless crying and butthurt feelings somewhere else