The saddest story is that these tactics have become popular in a lot of games today, and people like to enable it. There was nothing wrong with the cosmetic store that we have, and these new charms did not need to be the cause of another way to spend more money.
No. I understood the thread starter as exaggerated critique which I can understand. But I doubt that he is mad at least i am not mad about it. After all it is their decision. I just made a joke cause it made me giggle.
I supported them in the past and there was no doubt about it. But these achives seem like something fitting for f2p games and not games where you already pay for the content. So for me i have doubts about supporting that in the future cause I do not know how far they gonna dive into those f2p business stuff. I just really dislike these models because they tend to be tedious and I do not think that bhvr needs to do stuff like that.
Though, would you rather they run out of money and stop being able to give you the game you like? Most of it will be free or come in the store later. Calm down.
I'm sorry but I find it hard to believe that after having a cosmetic store that has outfits priced higher than any of their dlc, and releasing the game on multiple platforms still requires them to add a battlepass in a game that I would have never expected to see one in.
If you read my responses to most of these comments you can maybe start to understand. It's also very upsetting to see a lot of people supporting micro transactions, when they've been so controversial recently, and for good reason. Dead by daylight was the LAST game I expected to see a battlepass in, and I find it very aggravating. I understand the argument of them needing help financially to keep the game up and running but they're releasing the game on even more platforms, and as I said earlier, the full price for cosmetic outfits are higher than any of the dlc asking prices. The game is getting old and tired, and all I'm wanting is for it to feel new, not more ways to pay for stuff.
The point is when is enough enough? They have 2 lucrative sources of income with the new chapters and cosmetics. They are now implementing a 3rd inspired by free to play games.
@Spork This isn't Koei charging 3.99 for character portraits that were in the last game, this isn't Battlefront 2 having loot boxes for game altering perks, and it sure isn't 2k's casino fiasco. You're making an issue of something that has no bearing on you at all. They're cosmetics. If your will power is so weak that a simple device like a battlepass will have you enslaved, then you have bigger problem then DBD.
These are still micro transactions, there isn't a way to defend it to make it any less disappointing to me. I own all the dlc's, I've bought a handful of cosmetics, I just don't appreciate them adding a new micro transaction to the game, it's becoming too common. It's not as drastic as other games but where will it stop? It doesn't need to be something developers should be getting comfortable with. I'm glad my opinion was strong enough to bring you here though, thanks for sharing.
You'll only be missing out on some premium cosmetics, of which have been made with the artists time and effort for which they have been paid for. It's only fair to add a price to them.
Comments
Imagine spending over 100 bucks on a game and having a battle pass put in it...
@ProfessorDunwich Lmao, Imagine blaming your bad decisions on others.
Can't spend another $10? Sad story.
The saddest story is that these tactics have become popular in a lot of games today, and people like to enable it. There was nothing wrong with the cosmetic store that we have, and these new charms did not need to be the cause of another way to spend more money.
No. I understood the thread starter as exaggerated critique which I can understand. But I doubt that he is mad at least i am not mad about it. After all it is their decision. I just made a joke cause it made me giggle.
I supported them in the past and there was no doubt about it. But these achives seem like something fitting for f2p games and not games where you already pay for the content. So for me i have doubts about supporting that in the future cause I do not know how far they gonna dive into those f2p business stuff. I just really dislike these models because they tend to be tedious and I do not think that bhvr needs to do stuff like that.
Though, would you rather they run out of money and stop being able to give you the game you like? Most of it will be free or come in the store later. Calm down.
I'm sorry but I find it hard to believe that after having a cosmetic store that has outfits priced higher than any of their dlc, and releasing the game on multiple platforms still requires them to add a battlepass in a game that I would have never expected to see one in.
Still don't understand the issue. You are not forced to buy the Rift pass in any way. You can still use the store while ignoring the Rift pass.
I mean, can you see there finances or there sales? Do you have the info they do?
If you read my responses to most of these comments you can maybe start to understand. It's also very upsetting to see a lot of people supporting micro transactions, when they've been so controversial recently, and for good reason. Dead by daylight was the LAST game I expected to see a battlepass in, and I find it very aggravating. I understand the argument of them needing help financially to keep the game up and running but they're releasing the game on even more platforms, and as I said earlier, the full price for cosmetic outfits are higher than any of the dlc asking prices. The game is getting old and tired, and all I'm wanting is for it to feel new, not more ways to pay for stuff.
The point is when is enough enough? They have 2 lucrative sources of income with the new chapters and cosmetics. They are now implementing a 3rd inspired by free to play games.
More micro transactions. Support them if you want, but I for one will not.
Refreshing to see you say this <3.
It says specifically in the rift explanation that you can earn back the 1000 auric cells you used to buy the pass, through the rift.
@Spork This isn't Koei charging 3.99 for character portraits that were in the last game, this isn't Battlefront 2 having loot boxes for game altering perks, and it sure isn't 2k's casino fiasco. You're making an issue of something that has no bearing on you at all. They're cosmetics. If your will power is so weak that a simple device like a battlepass will have you enslaved, then you have bigger problem then DBD.
You will be missing out a lot without paying
These are still micro transactions, there isn't a way to defend it to make it any less disappointing to me. I own all the dlc's, I've bought a handful of cosmetics, I just don't appreciate them adding a new micro transaction to the game, it's becoming too common. It's not as drastic as other games but where will it stop? It doesn't need to be something developers should be getting comfortable with. I'm glad my opinion was strong enough to bring you here though, thanks for sharing.
From a 1100+ player, you couldn't have said it better.
You'll only be missing out on some premium cosmetics, of which have been made with the artists time and effort for which they have been paid for. It's only fair to add a price to them.
I never understand posts like these? If you don't like it then don't buy it? What's all the fuss about?
Stop whinging.
So, basically , you're angry that you can get free cosmetics forever as long as you spend 10 euros once and play the game?
Devs: You can now unlock several cosmetic sets for 1000 cells instead of paying 1000 cells for just one set and you can even earn your cells back!
Community: What a cash grab! Greedy devs!
If you think that a battle pass is just from Fortnite and Apex, you’re wrong.
The origins from this system can date back to Dota 2 and TF2. This isn’t anything new.
The rift is also just cosmetics. You can still do the challenges.