I feel the same way and also do it when the exit gate is opened and 3 survivors are still left, but it is still very annoying because there is little you can do
wait but it is a 4 v 1 lol
I'm not sure if you got it or if you read it wrong.
I'm saying: "It's one thing for Survivors to not really be a team instead of being one.
But it's a whole 'nother thing for the other 1/2/3 Survivor(s) to work with the Killer against you."
Yeah but its still 4 v 1. Also it would be hilarious to have all the other survivors against me tbh lol, but ive never seen anyone work with the killer before
Well yeah, it would still be 4v1, cause 3 Survs + 1 Killer, but that doesn't mean it's okay.
But I still don't think you got what I meant...
I named the Killer first and then the Survivors everytime, meaning when I say 3v2 for example, I'm saying 3 Killers vs 2 Survivors.
So the first one I said was 1 Killer versus 1 Survivor, 1 Survivor, 1 Survivor & 1 Survivor, which is a reference to the Survivors not actually being required to work together.
The second one is more obvious, I'm saying 1 Killer versus 4 Survivors.
The third one is where I switch the numbers around, but I don't switch the titles: The Survivor or Survivors join the Killer side to get remaining Survivor or Survivors killed, hence why it might turn into a 4v1 instead of 1v4.
It might be hilarious to you, but humour is subjective.
And indeed it happens rarely, I barely encounter it, but that doesn't really decrease my dissatisfaction with when it does happen.
Hope this cleared things up. 😊
look man youre talking about subjective humor and #########. All im saying is you said you didn't want the game to be 4 v 1. I said the games always 4 v1 cuz it is. I know you were talking about the survivor going against other survivors and the killer but the point still remains, its always the killer v 4 survivors. Also it would be hilarious to be a survivor in that situation. Objectively hilarious. Everyone else in the game would unite to actually bully you in a video game. What the ######### is that about? That's crazy i would love for it to happen to me. Now i gotta go watch some Proud family that i hope they have on youtube, i know they ainy got it on hulu or Netflix
The game cannot accept Survivors switching sides, it wasn't coded for that, hence it'll tell you it still is 1v4 while it no longer is 1v4.
wasn't coded for that lol
Yes, otherwise you'd get some sort of visual indicator whenever they would turn against eachother.
Youre a funny guy, I dig that
Guess we don't share a similar sense of humour, but happy to give you something positive. 😊
its like when I look at a meme some old person posts on facebook with minions on it you know
I wouldn't know, i don't use Facebook anymore for years now.
I see this happen a lot in my games at red ranks, survivors would start getting me off right when I get hooked, without BT then run away when the killer returns allowing myself to be downed again, then repeat the process.
All of these are good examples of frustrating ways to die, but I had to choose Survivors working with killers. Because the other choices are either bad luck or something mostly unintentional, while a survivor helping a killer is not.
A survivor working with the killer from the start is the worst, but sometimes when there are only two survivors alive, one turns on the other and I do not like that. I never did betray a survivor to work with the killer, so he or she could let me live, because it's not worth it. Betray someone just for a couple of points?
But I have seen it happen, from time to time. Last time, I send a pm to the player, because they revealed my location so the killer would let them live and they said "It's not my fault, the killer offered" and I replied "It is your fault, because you accepted to betray me, the killer did not force you to do it".
Being tunneled then moried after 1st unhook.