Avatar

liquidlight

liquidlight

About

Username
liquidlight
Joined
Visits
100
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
293
Badges
11
Posts
344

Badges

Third Anniversary250 Up VotesSecond AnniversaryFirst Anniversary100 Up Votes100 Comments25 Up VotesName Dropper10 Comments5 Up VotesFirst Comment

Comments

  • When I've seen people suicide on hook at 5 gens it's almost always because the killer is camping them, which is freaking ridiculous because there are 5 gens still. Who wants to hang until they die when the killer won't leave to find someone else and won't commit to chase when someone does come to try and make a save. Dying…
  • Personally, I would rather survivors try to save me, especially if I'm on my first hook. There is nothing worse, imo, then dying on the first hook at the beginning of the game (something you don't even get to play because of it). The killer shouldn't be a jerk if there are 4/5 gens still in play and actually go chase…
  • I posted about this in Feedback, too. So glad other people are annoyed by it. We need an auto-allocate button to speed things up. Edit: I had to add that it should be optional. That way people can decide when they want to use it and when they don't.
  • It would be intense to play against or as old Freddy. I'd be down for that option, for sure. it would be cool if they added a way to switch between the two.
  • Poor twins. I love the concept of them and when someone knows how to play them without being toxic it's really fun and even as scary as a jump scare Myers. One of my favorite games I ever played was against The Twins. I didn't even survive, but the laughs and screams made me not care about the loss. 🤣 I wish people gave…
  • It would be great (and potentially hilarious) to see her walking around, or even standing, in this pose in game. 😂
  • You can't say he/she is all talk "if not" because they never claimed they were 99% with scratched mirror Myers without stalking and with no perks. They said they're 99% [the way they play]. It's a BIG difference. Let them prove they are THEIR WAY, which is what they originally claimed anyway, if they want to prove it.…
  • I would be all for killers getting double points for thumbs up since it could be more challenging for them to receive any. They need to do something to make the game less toxic. Punishing players isn't working.
  • I don't even bother with flashlights because I'm on PS4. It feels almost impossible to get a blind in any situation other than a killer breaking a pallet.
  • I want to see this so bad now. 😂
  • Why not? It has no serious effect on anything. Edit: I'm all for not having a thumbs down option if that's what you're worried about.
  • That's not true. I've messaged nurses to tell them how much fun I've had playing against them. I probably still have the messages on my PS4. I would have thumbs up'd them if it would have actually mattered. Personally, for me, Nurse is one of my favorite killers to go against (probably because she's so unique and rare to…
  • I don't think suffer is the right word. "Miss out" seems more appropriate. I'm sure there's a way around it with a little brainstorming.
  • Then don't have down votes. Just up votes. That way points aren't lost.
  • I wouldn't want it to be a reportable offense either, but I can see it being abused and I think that would upset people. If it happened too much it would ruin the games for a lot of people (mostly survivors since its more likely they would experience it the most since killers hold the power there).
  • I believe you. I played killer yesterday for the first time after a LONG break from the game (got sucked into a different one) because I wanted the event cosmetics. I got a 4k every single game. The first game I used Hag and I wasn't used to my camera speed or the buttons. Hit the air a few times trying to set traps 🤣.…
  • You're forgetting that they supposedly don't even count DCs AND a lot of killer mains, especially those that decimate their opponents, let the last survivor go in order to "be nice" and it's safe to assume some do so purposefully to lower their kill rates (mostly people who know they're wrecking survivors and don't want…
  • I had a similar idea to this and love the thought of rewarding and not punishing (since it's obviously not working anyway). The only thing is I personally don't care about blood points. They just don't mean anything to me but that's because I have an abundance of them and the items you get with them. I'd prefer iridescent…
  • I would. I'm in red all the time already. I would continue to play it because it would be the most challenging for me. Edit: Also, it wouldn't matter if they did or not. The two modes would be a part of the same game. People would still be playing the game overall. No loss for the devs.
  • They just need two types of modes: Casual, where there are no ranks at all, and Ranked, where there are ranks. That would solve a lot of issues, I think. But really, I don't think they're that concerned with the top players. The point is to bring in new people and get them playing long enough to buy some things. As long as…
  • I have to disagree. Hooks matter. For both killer and survivor. For example, you WANT to pair up survivors who get hooked the least amount of times with killers who get the most hooks. Why? Because those survivors are amazing at either running or hiding, possibly both, and that killer is amazing at chasing and catching.…
  • Well, that's silly to me. Pink and purple add-ons should be difficult for EVERYONE to get. They shouldn't be in the majority of matches or in every blood web. And maybe they should even expire if not used in a certain amount of time. Especially if they're super powerful and tilt the game severely to one side.
  • 478 4k streak? What the.... Hold on. Let me pick my jaw up off the floor.
  • The blood points actually are important otherwise he wouldn't be able to get the add-ons needed to make a video like that. But, obviously, auric cells are something most people would want more, I assume, because of all those cosmetics in the store that you can purchase with only them. That is, until you have everything…
  • Excellent point. 🤣 I wonder if everyone played their best/hardest what the game would be like. Probably some twisted version of hell but each torment session just lasts 1 to 5 minutes and is just a straight up crush-fest to one side.
  • Oh, yeah. I've gotten plenty when I play survivor (as well as killer). I have a friend who got hate mail and still does to this day by the same killer. They have an ongoing feud of who can stay red rank 1 and just talk made crap to each other. And no, they're not friends but they'll randomly send each other screen shots of…
  • They sound like awful, miserable people with egos are too big for this planet. Don't listen to them, though. I know it's hard but what you did was really nice and there are people out there who appreciate when killers show mercy/kindness like that. Whenever I've been spared by a killer I usually give them hearts. 🤣 And, of…
  • Yeah, I'll agree the killer had skill, though an advantage immediately knowing where everyone was. I personally just don't get matches like this. I don't see how it's fun for either side. I guess the killer gets to show off and brag about it? But I don't know. Playing out the match, experiencing the challenge, having those…
  • Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it's not something that happens. Your experience isn't the sum of everyone else's. Just as mine isn't yours. But I have played other games with tons of bugs like this. We've just been down different roads. Edit: The difference with the other games I've played is the errors are…
  • Exactly what I was saying about actually fixing the errors. I play other games that have a lot, too, but they're almost always fixed within 24hrs to a couple days. Never lasting more than a week. The time it takes to repair the game busting errors is the real issue and it should be a huge priority for the developers. More…